How much do SUMMITFEED Basic, Standard, and Premium GEO plans cost?

SUMMITFEED Basic GEO pricing starts at KRW 2,000,000 per month. It is based on one target question, the recommended contract term is three months, and VAT is excluded. Standard and Premium monthly pricing varies.

Basic, Standard, and Premium do not share one fixed fee. Basic has a published starting price, while the other two plans vary according to the contracted scope.

Before signing, confirm the monthly fee, target-question count, contract term, and VAT treatment for the selected plan. The published Basic terms can be compared directly below.

GEO When you search for agency prices, there's a reason the amounts aren't organized at a glance. This is because GEO is not yet a standardized package market, but is closer to an executable service designed according to the brand's inquiry strategy and site status. Even if they use the same name 'AI search optimization', some only include article publishing, while others include site structure diagnosis, Schema application, and AI citation rate tracking.

For example, if your site is already well-organized with technology SEO, you can start by focusing on content structuring and monitoring. Conversely, if a site has an unstable sitemap, canonical, metadata, or FAQ structure, initial diagnosis and technical maintenance costs will be incurred first. So your quote will naturally vary depending on your industry, target number of questions, and existing site quality.

The important thing is not just the numbers on the price tag. We need to see what execution units are included in that amount. This is because the key to GEO is ‘what questions will make our brand a candidate for answers’ rather than ‘how many issues are issued’.

In GEO, the number of target questions greatly determines the cost. The amount of content and monitoring scope required are different when targeting only one or two key questions, such as 'GEO Agency Recommendation', and when tracking dozens of questions across industries. Because AI search generates answers in groups of questions rather than single keywords, question design becomes a lot of work.

Increasing the number of targeted questions does not just increase the number of manuscripts. Each question should be designed with an answer structure, relevant sections, FAQs, comparison tables, and internal links. Additionally, operational costs increase as questions must be repeatedly tested in ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity and any changes in answers must be recorded.

Therefore, rather than asking too many questions from the beginning, it is more efficient to start with key questions with high purchase intent. SUMMITFEED usually recommends that brands first select questions that are likely to lead to actual inquiries, and then expand the range of questions as they start to show citation potential.

Schema is structured data that helps AI and search engines understand the nature of the page more clearly. In GEO articles, JSON-LD, such as BlogPosting and FAQPage, are often used, and structures such as Organization, LocalBusiness, and Service can be reviewed together in service pages or company introduction areas.

The problem is that simply attaching Schema and reliably reflecting it in the entire site template have different levels of difficulty. Putting JSON-LD on just one page is relatively simple, but applying a common renderer to multiple articles and handling published status, canonical, sitemap, and FAQ presence together increases the development scope.

Therefore, when receiving a quote for GEO, you must check whether the application of Schema reflects actual development or only provides a document guide. If development reflection is included, the initial cost may increase, but in the long run, structured data automatically follows each time a new article is published, improving operational efficiency.

GEO does not end with publishing content. AI answers are not based on fixed search rankings, but rather change based on how the question is asked, timing, platform, and competitive content. So, even after publication, you need to check whether your brand is mentioned in targeted questions and how your competitors are featured.

The wider the monitoring scope, the higher the cost. The required checking time varies depending on whether you only look at ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity, and whether you look at only 10 questions or up to 100. Additionally, if you analyze response patterns and suggest the next course of correction, rather than simply capturing them, the report cost is included.

Some of the lower priced GEO packages do not include monitoring. In this case, even though it seems cheap right now, it is difficult to determine whether there has actually been a change in AI search. When comparing costs, it is important to check whether monitoring is present or not.

The most common mistake is comparing prices based solely on the number of manuscripts per month. GEO When it comes to content, question response and structure are more important than simple volume. Even among the same three articles, some articles are good for AI to use as response pieces, while others have a lot of promotional text and are therefore less likely to be cited.

Another thing is to only look at the phrase ‘AI search optimization’ and not check the actual scope of its implementation. If question strategy, Schema, FAQPage JSON-LD, sitemap reflection, published status management, and citation rate monitoring are missing, it may be closer to a general content agency than GEO.

Even a lower price quote can make sense. However, it must be clear whether the estimate is for testing, long-term operation, development reflection, or separate monitoring. A good estimate clearly shows the scope of work before the cost.